Brasilodon quadrangularis measured about 20 cm (8 in) long, and would have scurried under the feet of the first dinosaurs during the Late Triassic period. It belongs to a group of animals known as the cynodonts, and while it’s long been thought to be a very close relative of mammals it sits outside of the mammaliaformes clade, which contains all known mammals, living and extinct.
In the new study, an international team of researchers has shaken up the family tree, proposing that Brasilodon should be crowned the earliest known mammal. That’s because of one very specific feature, newly identified in the animal’s fossil remains, that’s unique to mammals.
We all remember losing our baby teeth as kids, before growing a new set of adult teeth. That pattern of two – and only two – successive sets of teeth is known as diphyodonty, and it’s common to all mammals. By contrast, reptiles and some other creatures regenerate teeth many times over during their lives. Diphyodonty is part of a complex process of skull anatomy changes during the early stages of a mammal’s life, which is linked to suckling milk and other mammalian traits.
The researchers on the new study closely examined the anatomy of the teeth and jaws of Brasilodon specimens, and compared them to more recent mammals. In doing so, they found evidence of secondary teeth that would replace primary ones in a highly ordered and timed manner, indicating diphyodonty.
That makes Brasilodon the oldest vertebrate to demonstrate this dentition pattern, and by extension the earliest known mammal. It predates the currently accepted record-holder, Morganucodon, by about 20 million years. That said, the researchers don’t claim that the case is closed – instead, they’re open to scientific argument.
“The evidence from how the dentition was built over developmental time is crucial and definitive to show that Brasilodons were mammals,” said Professor Moya Meredith Smith, contributing author of the study. “Our paper raises the level of debate about what defines a mammal and shows that it was a much earlier time of origin in the fossil record than previously known.”
The research was published in the Journal of Anatomy.
Source: Natural History Museum